Massoud Hassani Interview

I found another very interesting video about Hassani's efforts.

Mine Kafon

Massoud Hassani is an Afghan product designer who fled to the Netherlands with his family when he was a young boy, after the death of his father. Filmmaker Callum Cooper created a short film about him and his efforts to remove landmines from his home country. The film is now a semifinalist in the Focus Forward Filmmaker Competition. Hassani based his idea of toys he and his friends used to build when he lived in Afghanistan. They would created objects that would roll across the desert powered by wind to race them, but the danger of remaining landmines caused Hassani's mother to prevent him from playing outside. In order to keep the citizens of his homeland safe, Hassani developed a larger rolling device with many legs that can be propelled entirely by wind and is made of materials costing only 40 euros.

Video entered into the contest by Callum Cooper

This idea is an incredible example of Occam's Razor; the simplest idea is the cheapest and is very effective. His product is based on homemade toys from his childhood, and is designed to keep other children safe. As seen in the video, it can essentially be constructed and used by almost anyone. Currently, it costs about $1200 dollars to clear a single landmine. Hassani's idea is cheap, effective, and reusable for three or four mines. The only issue is that this can only be used under certain conditions, which are a relatively flat terrain and a consistently windy location. These conditions may not be met in every area that needs a mine cleared. But as far as helping to ensure a safer childhood than he had, Massoud Hassani is doing a wonderful service, and he deserves to be commended for these efforts.

Vimeo page for Cooper's video

Mars Colony

The founder and CEO of SpaceX, Elon Musk, hopes to establish a colony on Mars of up to 80,000 people, which he announced to the Royal Aeronautical Society in London, on Friday. The pioneering group would theoretically consist of 10 or fewer people and the trips would be made aboard a reusable rocket powered by liquid oxygen and methane. Musk suggested that the trip would most likely cost upwards of $500,000 for a ticket. This price is based on what Musk thinks is affordable for citizens "in advanced countries, in their mid-forties" that want to go. He also estimated that the entire program would cost around $36 billion dollars. The founders of the colony would establish large transparent domes pressurized with atmospheric CO2 so that Earth crops could be grown in the Martian soil.

Elon Musk hopes to ferry 80,000 civilians to The Red Planet

This prospective trip marks huge stepping stones and a large paradigm shift in multiple fields. However, the adjacent possible doesn't seem to be large enough that this trip is currently possible. The rocket to be used will be an evolution of SpaceX's Falcon 9, but according to Musk, "It's going to be much bigger [than Falcon 9], but I don't think we're quite ready to state the payload." The prospect of mass colonization hasn't been considered by Americans in many years, so it will be interesting to see how many people are eager and willing to make this voyage and join the colony. The problem of global overcrowding will definitely play a factor in how important and potentially necessary this trip will become in the coming years. This also marks a shift toward practical fuel sources other than gasoline. Using methane will reduce the costs compared to kerosene, and it is much less risky than using hydrogen. The prospect of using a reusable rocket marks another paradigm shift and will add many considerations to the development of the rocket and the entire project.

http://news.discovery.com/space/mars-colony-spacex-121126.html

Killer Robots?!?!

I didn't intend for this blog to take the path toward "technological advancements that scare the crap out of me" but it seems that's where it's heading considering the article I just read is titled, "Ban 'Killer Robots' Before It's Too Late." The development of fully autonomous robots that could independently decide who it kills are being strongly challenged by the Human Rights Watch, and with good cause. In my opinion, one human does not have the right to decide whether another human lives or dies. To suggest that we are capable of programming a robot to essentially calculate that decision is disturbing and inhumane.

I couldn't find any images of the "killer robots"
but I'm sure they'll look something like this

The article recognizes the argument that utilizing this technology could save human lives in battle, but the author intelligently rebukes that statement by suggesting this will only make it that much easier to go to war. And the presence of these robots greatly increases the chance for civilian casualties. Humans are blessed with the gift of compassion, and granting a robot the ability to kill, with a lack of any sort of judgment is absurd. To me, this so-called advancement is more of a step backward than forward.

http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/11/19/ban-killer-robots-it-s-too-late

Artificial Muscles are Terrifyingly Strong!

Tiny nanofibers that are being developed by a team of international researchers are 200 times strong than human muscle fibers of equal size. Now, I know this is an incredible feat of science and will be extremely useful, but that kind of strength, operating the way human muscles naturally do is pretty scary from a science fiction standpoint. According to the article I read, these artificial muscles could give robots more natural-looking facial expressions. I can't understand why that would be necessary other than to confuse someone, or just scare the crap out of them. However, as a prospective textile engineer, this technology is exciting for my potential careers or research. These fibers could be used to develop better water filters and improve the overall quality of living for many people. Much research and development is still needed to make this technology more practical, so hopefully, I could become involved in something like this in my own future education and career.

Microscopic image of the nanofibers

I'm all for advancements of technology, but we need to make sure we are constantly keeping the uses of this technology in check. To me, more human robots is not an advancement that will improve the overall quality of living among the human race. Greater access to clean water, on the other hand, will save lives, and make the research worth the time and money.

The Man With the Bionic Leg

Zac Vawter lost his right leg in a motorcycle accident, but yesterday, he became the first person to climb Chicago's Willis Tower with a bionic limb. He wears a prosthetic leg that is completely controlled by his mind, weighs ten pounds, and resembles something out of a sci-fi movie.

This marks an incredible stride made in the field of prosthesis, but I can't help be reminded of the future imagined by William Gibson in "Neuromancer." I'm not saying I think these advancements are necessarily dangerous to our society, but we will have to be careful about what direction the development goes in this field. I don't like the future Gibson offers, especially the fact that everyone seems to need to make physical alterations to their body for the sake of vanity in order to fit in. I believe in a more organic way of living, and I think these alterations should only be made in extreme medical situations where the change would make them more human in the eyes of society. I think this applies to Vawter's situation. With only one leg, he may be seen as an outcast and will have to make adjustments that others don't have to. However, his mind-controlled prosthetic allows him to function as everyone else does, and he isn't viewed as disabled or outcast.  I think he proved this point by accomplishing "SkyRise Chicago."

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/1282719--man-with-thought-controlled-bionic-leg-climbs-103-floors